Nothing New Under The Sun?: The Science and Religion Conflict

Surely, however, the conflict of science and religion is something new? A common story goes something like this: while there were early stirrings of dissent in Pope Urban VIII’s condemnation of Galileo, it was the principled opposition to tradition and superstition in the eighteenth-century movement known as ‘the Enlightenment’ which really got the argument going, and then Darwin dealt the vital death-blow to traditional readings of Scripture. Since that time, people have accepted that science is a superior way to truth, and that religion is outmoded, an anti-intellectual clinging to discredited traditions.

If this story were true, then we could not expect to hear any echoes of recent debates in antiquity. There is truth in the story: experimental science is a relatively new practice, which began about the time of Galileo, and it has been remarkably successful in offering theories, usually mathematical, that either describe the way the world works or at least successfully model it. At the heart of the method of experimental science is the careful and disciplined observation of the natural world.

The ancient Greeks would never have given time to such careful observation. They generally believed that the material world was made up of flawed and imperfect copies of spiritual realities. Why study a distorted copy when you can contemplate the original, they would have asked. Our current debates about science and religion are not really about scientific method, however. Today we all accept that the best way to find out how the natural world works is by science. (Even Christian creationists do not deny the explanatory power of science. Instead, they claim that an alternative scientific construction, which is more in accord with a particular reading of parts of the book of Genesis, is a better way of explaining the observed scientific evidence than the generally- accepted scientific view). Rather, our interesting debates are at deeper philosophical levels about our human identity, and morality, and the origin of the world. The ancient Greeks debated precisely these points at length, and we can find insight for our own debates in what they had to say.

Source: Test of Faith (Dr. Stephen R. Holmes)


One thought on “Nothing New Under The Sun?: The Science and Religion Conflict

  1. Apparently there is some thing new under the sun and it may very well being the conflict between science and religion to an abrupt if painful end for many, and I doubt either side of this argument will find it comforting to discover just how ‘unknowning’, presumptious and now untenable their positions are! As the first wholly new interpretation for two thousand years of the moral teachings of Christ is published on the web. History has its first literal, testable and fully demonstrable proof for faith.

    Radically different from anything else we know of from history, this new teaching is predicated upon a precise, predefined and predictable experience and called ‘the first Resurrection’ in the sense that the Resurrection of Jesus was intended to demonstrate Gods’ willingness to real Himself and intervene directly into the natural world for those obedient to His will, paving the way for access, by faith, to the power of divine transcendence and ultimate proof!

    Thus ‘faith’ becomes an act of trust in action, to search and discover this direct individual intervention into the natural world by omnipotent power that confirms divine will, law, command and covenant, which at the same time, realigns our moral compass with the Divine, “correcting human nature by a change in natural law, altering biology, consciousness and human ethical perception beyond all natural evolutionary boundaries.” So like it or no, a new religious teaching, testable by faith, meeting all Enlightenment criteria of evidence based causation and definitive proof now exists. Nothing short of an intellectual, moral and religious revolution is getting under way. To test or not to test, that is the question?

    More info at,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s